Jan. 14th, 2010

afterthree: (doctor points)
I feel as thought I haven't posted very much in January. This is because I haven't. :P There are several half-written posts sitting all over the place, but I never seem to have the time to finish them.

But there is stuff! So I'm bringing the bullet points:

  • Fandom friends! Once again there's a fandom charity event taking place, this time to raise funds to help people in Haiti. Last time we had a fandom charity event we raised quite a lot of dollars, so check out [community profile] help_haiti for neat fandom things being auctioned off. Also! If you remember, the Christmas before last I made some terribly cute Harry Potter plushies. These little guys are fun to make, so I've put one/a pair on auction at [community profile] help_haiti; check my thread here.


  • Last week Facebook banned Calgary transman Dominic Scaia from Facebook for posting a post-op photo of his bare chest. The photo did not break any of Facebook's Terms of Service that I can tell. It was neither excessively gory nor sexual in any way.

    It's unclear what bothered Facebook about Dominic's photos. Section 3.7 of its Terms of Service regulates that content not be "hateful, threatening, pornographic" or contain "nudity or graphic or gratuitous violence." It's clear a male chest falls into none of these categories. Scaia says, "They were from two-and-a-half weeks post-op and included my face. I was holding the camera from above, my chest was bare and I was wearing jeans. None of the photos were in the least bit gory."

    Facebook does not moderate photographs individually. They rely on users to report offensive content. The only people who could view Scaia's pictures were friends that he'd added to his account. He'd had the photos up for a week without a problem. The evening before he was banned, Dominic accepted a friend request from a young, flirtatious girl. He thinks she looked through his photos and discovered that the cute boy she'd added was not born physically male, choosing then to report his account.

    It's there where things become confusing. It's Facebook's policy to remove photos that are deemed offensive and to send a warning. It is not the company's policy to disable accounts over photos. This does not mean that Facebook has a rule of banning transgender people, it means that one staff moderator made the grossly misinformed choice to ban his account.


    Over 6,000 people have joined a Facebook group in an attempt to raise awareness about this. Today, Scaia finally received a reply back from Facebook, saying his photos were in violation of the Terms of Service. His account has been reinstated, but all his post-surgery photos have been removed, and he has been sternly told not to upload photos of "that sort" again, saying: "photos containing nudity or other graphic or sexually suggestive content are not allowed".Local radio show Gaywire has published an open letter to Facebook. Xtra.ca has an article with one of the photos in question here.

    Any signal boosting would be appreciated. Facebook is a major social networking site and a major photo-sharing site that many trans people -- including Scaia -- use for advocacy and sharing personal stories and experiences with other transmen and women, and sharing post-op photos is part of that sharing. This was a transphobic knee-jerk reaction by a company after one transphobic user reported the image. There was no warning; the account was immediately frozen. It took Facebook over a week to respond to questions and un-freeze the account. This is not cool on many levels.

Profile

afterthree: (Default)
afterthree

August 2010

S M T W T F S
12 34 567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags